100 Days of Blogging

A little over three months ago, I decided to be more intentional about blogging, to blog every day to be precise. So, what have I learned?

simplified blogging

Click through the picture for more great cartoons.

(Actually, that’s not entirely accurate in my case, as my commenters are very kind.)

This has actually been a very helpful and clarifying few months. It’s funny how being intentional in a pursuit seems to answer lots of questions you didn’t know to ask.

What I’ve learned in the past 100 days:

I like writing. I mean I really like writing, and it’s a helpful and necessary outlet for me. I always had this “some day I’ll write” voice in the back of my head. With blogging, I don’t have to wait til someday; I can be a writer now.

The more I write, the better I get at writing. Of course, there are posts that are the exception to the rule. Ahem.

Showing up is a huge part of success. Because I committed to writing everyday, I felt confident enough that I’m “real blogger” enough to apply for BlogCon. Through that experience, I know have a new opportunity writing for The Washington Times Community Pages. As I plug away at that, who knows what other doors may open.

In my rather isolated homeschooling world, I don’t have a lot of face-to-face discussions about civil liberties or geo-political events. (Well, Little Miss is getting more interested in those things. YAY!) Writing and researching for my writing is a way to access those interests and participate in a conversation that’s very important to me, even if I’m not physically in a community that values those things. It’s also of use to those in that community who really aren’t interesting in my ramblings.

It’s a tangible accomplishment. As a homeschooling mom, there are days and weeks and even months where there is no tangible sense of accomplishment. The housework is never done. There are times when I wonder if a particular kid has learned anything in the past weeks. And laundry. Ugh. Of course, a child will have a breakthrough and all of the sudden they’re reading, or mathing, or doing whatever awesomeness they do, and that’s wonderful. But there’s still laundry. With blogging, I write a post and it’s there. And I get to put another X in the chain. It may not get read by a soul, but I’ve done something that I can point to and say “Done!” I won’t be able to do that with my kids til… Well, I’m still not done, so probably when we’re all in heaven. And there’s still laundry.

What are my goals for the next 100 days:

I want to continue to improve my writing skills. My column is a different sort of writing than my blogging here, and it’s challenging (in a good way) to make that switch. I hope to grow in skill and knowledge. Part of that is just the physical act of writing, but part of that is reading more, and reading more intentionally.

I’ll work to increase my audience. That may mean changing the focus or presentation of the blog, or it may be selling myself better. I’ve procured one mentor (Hi, Jimmie!), and I’m probably going to procure other mentors and advisors to help with this aspect. (FYI, this is how you procure a mentor: ask.)

I want to develop a more defined theme for my blogging. In the lingo of the social media world, I want to better brand my blog. When people ask me what my style/philosophy of homeschooling is, I’ve generally said “eclectic!” But as the years have passed, I’ve actually become less eclectic and more focused on one style (Charlotte Mason, in my case.) It’s great to be interested in everything initially, but I think I need to start becoming more focused than I have been. That isn’t to say I’ll ignore everything but whatever I decide to brand my blog, but that I’ll become more intentional and informed on a few things, rather than trying to be slightly aware of everything. No more “inch deep and a mile wide.”

And that’s the plan. What about you? What would 100 days of intentionality do for your interests?

Fine Arts Friday: Birthday happenings

Today is MTG’s birthday and he’s taken the day off.  We’re going to see the decidedly unfine-artsy “Star Trek: Into Darkness.” Then we’ll probably take the kids to the nature preserve or something similar, and I’ll make him a birthday cobbler. That is to say, we aren’t going to be concentrating on a lot of fine arts today.

Since it’s the beginning of a new month, we have a new hymn and folksong, so that’s what you’re getting today!

The hymn in the Ambleside schedule is Lo, He Comes with Clouds Descending (audio auto plays at that link. Grrr.)  It’s interesting, because it’s often referred to as a Christmas hymn, but listed in the schedule in June. Perhaps in preparation of Christmas in July activities. This is an interesting analysis and history of the hymn. There are many lovely choral arrangements, but this particular version will be easy to sing in our living room.  Plus, Sprite could try to play along if she wants.

 

The folk song is “Nobody Knows the Trouble I’ve Seen,” an old spiritual that is probably one of the better known folk songs, partly due to its use in pop culture. To name a few, it’s been used in Spaceballs, The Lion King, Muppets (parody) and most recently, The Big Bang Theory.

In light of the fact that it is often used in pop culture, usually in a self-pitying way, it’s important to teach the history of the song. The song was published with additional lyrics in Slaves Songs of the United States, the first collection of African-American art of any kind, published just after the Civil War by abolitionists. Sung by slaves who knew much of trouble and whose hope was almost entirely in the hereafter, it gives us a picture of the life and creativity of our countrymen and fellow believers of that time. Louis Armstrong’s version is perhaps the best known, but other lovely versions are by Paul Robeson, a slightly jazzier version by Lena Horne, and the amazing Marian Anderson.

It’s a beautiful song and I look forward to learning it with my children this month.

It’s also National Donut Day. Conduct yourselves accordingly.

 

We’re all under surveillance now

fusion center

At least he’s not playing Galaga.

This week the Supreme Court ruled that those being arrested, not convicted of any crime, can have their DNA taken and entered into a database to compare against DNA taken from cold cases.

Last week a federal judge ruled that Google must turn over records to the government, even though the FBI had no warrant, relying instead on “National Security Letters.”

Increasingly, everything about us—our genetic information, our activities, our beliefs—are being distilled to entries into gigantic databases.

In a few states, lawmakers jump at the carrot of an extensive online library, and let a private venture gather personal data on students and store it in the cloud. Indeed, young people have so much data collected from them at every point of their lives, it is a wonder they have any concept of privacy at all.

And yesterday we learned that the NSA is currently collecting millions of phone records of citizens from Verizon. This massive collection of information is the meta-data that tells who called whom and for how long, as well as other identifiers like location. The collection began in April and will continue through July 19.

There is no indication that Verizon is the only phone company supplying the government this data. It seems a reasonable assumption that all phone companies in the U.S. received similar demands, and they probably complied with them.

 

Read more at my Washington Times Community Pages column “Between Errands.”

Fanning the spark into flame

At yesterday’s Congressional Hearing on IRS targeting of Conservative Groups, Tea Party leader Karen Kenney gave this moving testimony, which every citizen should read or watch.

Every day, we get more and more evidence that the IRS has engaged in a campaign of suppression, harassment, and intimidation of conservative groups. They mostly targeted small groups headed by kitchen table activists by asking intrusive questions, making inappropriate demands, dragging on the application process for months on end. For larger groups, the IRS has allegedly used another tactic of suppression: disclosing confidential donor lists to various political opponents.

The Tea Party rallies began in 2009 and continued in force through 2010.  These were the epitome of grassroots events: average citizens coming together to protest government overreach like the TARP legislation, the various stimulus bills , and the health care bill. But while the rallies were galvanizing and worked to bring people of similar ideas, a movement cannot ride on the emotional energy or protests forever.

The next logical step was organizing into groups to educate and influence, fanning the fire lit at the rallies into a wildfire that would change the face of the political discussion. We saw some evidence of this in the 2010 elections. But the fire did not continue to spread after the 2010 elections with the same intensity as those early days. It might have just been natural fading of interest after an intense start. It might be that the moment had passed. But maybe it wasn’t the fire fading so much as being suffocated.

We are learning that a weaponized IRS tried to stamp out these sparks before they could unite, either through preventing them for growing beyond the kitchen table, or by monopolizing their time and money interaction with the IRS. It seems like they had some success in their suppression. We may never know how many groups just quit the process. The latest information we have is that 236 groups’ applications were under review for over 200 days, and that was already revised upward once from 132. We know the “two low-level employees” has already been revised to be 88, including Lois Lerner, director of the IRS exempt organization office, so we can probably expect the reports of those targeted, the extent of the targeting, and those involved to expand as well.

Killing those small groups was, I think, their main goal. If the Tea Party movement could be prevented from transforming from a protest movement to a grassroots activism movement at the local level, the effectiveness of the groups would be thwarted. National groups are all well and good, but we are a federal representative government. We vote for our representation locally, we pass local and state laws, as well as send Representatives and Senators to Washington from our home states.  Activism at the state, county, city, and neighborhood level is what really moves mountains. Stamp out those small groups and you prevent the fire from catching hold.

That was their plan: kill the infant in the cradle, but now we know. We know their tactics and their methods, and we know who they fear: small groups of citizens working in their communities to effect change.  The question is, what do we do now? Now that we know that the federal government and all its many tentacles has been used–and probably will be used to suppress political opposition–how do we counter it?

Obviously, much of this will need to be addressed with legislation or even in the courts. But the citizens sitting at the kitchen table or listening to the news and shaking our heads can act and make a difference.  We can contact our Representatives and Senators and tell them we demand full investigation and that the abuses be corrected. It takes two minutes to send an email or make a call, and we are a representative democracy. They do care about what their constituents say, whether because they actually care (ha!) or they care about their jobs, your opinion matters to them.

But how do we stop it before thousands of people have their rights violated? The quote comes to mind, “When the light appears, darkness flees.”  Every person testifying before Congress is bowing and scraping and saying, “It never should have happened!” (Well, except for Lois Lerner, who apparently read at least one amendment in the Bill of Rights.)  Sheepish, like a 3 year old with his hand in the cookie jar, they “apologize” when we know damn well it will happen again if they think they can get away with it. The sheer power and “usefulness” of the IRS as a tool to stop dissent is too appealing to the powermongers in charge.

We must be prepared the next time the IRS, or the EPA, or any government bureaucracy comes to stamp out a spark. We must continue to shine a light, not only on the abuses, but on the raw power the government exercises upon its citizens. We must be much quicker about speaking out, reaching out, calling lawyers and bloggers and media. Anytime the government steps even slightly out of the bright lines of the Constitution, we need to shine a thousand watt light on it.

And most importantly, we can get back to our kitchen tables and get back to work.

Terrible Tuesday: A new adventure

Thirteen years ago today…

001

“You DO NOT want to mess with me after the day I’ve had!”

Our Little Miss is 13. My heart is overflowing with all sorts of emotions. I can barely believe that this use to be her! And us! Man, we were noobs. She was only 4lb 15 oz when she was born. Other than being small, she was very healthy, but she was oh so tiny. Newborn clothes and diapers swallowed her. Now she can wear my clothes.

This is us, not actually believing they let us take her home.

This is us, not actually believing they let us take her home. We had absolutely no clue about what were doing.

I miss cuddling this little pea, but I love the young lady she has become. She is such a beautiful, intelligent, fun person. Babies are delightful, and children are entertaining, but teens are interesting. I’m looking forward to the sharing the next few years with her as she stretches her wings, pursues her dreams, and begins her own quest for world domination. (We’re a lot alike.)

Thirteen

Is that a nature journal or her plans to take over the world?

Happy birthday, sweet girl. You make my heart happy. Bittersweet links! (Somebody pass me a tissue.)

NASA is awesome.

15 Things you should give up to happy. A lot of wisdom at that link.

Tips and advice for a distracted people. (That’d be me.)

I can’t wrap my mind around getting upset at this ad. Some people need to be shin kicked.

The Difference Between Congregational Worship and a Concert.

Great tip for overcoming worry.

One in Ten Young People Have Been Rejected for Jobs Because of Their Social Media History.

And the weekly Kid Snippet. I can see my boys doing this one.

Astronomy tidbits

Summer nights are the great for stargazing. Since I’ll be spending a few weeks with my parents in West Texas, I’ll have even more opportunity for viewing the heavens. So I thought I’d start the week off with a bit of astronomical geekery.

Most people heard that an asteroid came near (in astronomical terms) the earth last week. But did you know that the asteroid had its own orbiting moon? How awesome is that?  Also, NASA has plans to kidnap an asteroid. I’m pretty sure that’s a violation of galactic law.

One of my favorite sites to peruse is the “Astronomy Picture of the Day” site. Look! A butterfly! (Or as the astronomers creatively call it “The Red Rectangle Nebula.”

apod butterfly

The June skymap is available; go enjoy the sky!

Worthy causes

A former pastor use to talk about leaving room in the margins of our budget in order to be able to give. In the Bible, the people are instructed to leave the corners of their fields as well as what is dropped by the harvesters so that the poor could come through the field after harvest and gather food for themselves. My pastor’s point was that we should leave room in our budgets to be able to give to those in need, in addition to our regularly scheduled charitable activities.

This is excellent advice that I really ought to take.  Like many families, finances are pretty tight right now, and there have been many times when a need has arisen and I haven’t been able to give, or not been able to give nearly what I wanted. We really need to leave room in the margins, but we haven’t done that. Our charity dollars are pretty much all claimed.

Over the past few months, we’ve received well over a dozen appeals for funding from high school and college students. These admirable young people are looking for funding for things like mission trips, service projects at home, and camps or trips that also include service projects. I’ve also seen fundraising efforts for people–not always students–to attend conference of various types.

I understand that times are hard, and families don’t have a lot of money for extras, so crowd-sourcing is an appealing way to gain an experience that’s otherwise out of reach. And all of these things seem to be great experiences that would benefit the kids and young adults seeking them.

But…

Funds are tight for everyone now, and honestly, we can’t afford to be writing many extra checks for people to not providing necessary goods or services for our family. Our charity dollars are carefully allotted.  Given so many worthy causes, life-changing experience for young people falls below disaster relief, long-term missions, or other worthy charities we want to support. I feel really bad about it, but honestly I’ve just been ignoring those types of appeals entirely this year, and I doubt I’m the only one.

But when times are tough, the tough get creative.  While I may not have a lot of extra money for direct donations, my family still needs goods and services.  I’ll go out of my way to spend my money in a way that also supports a worthy cause. Let’s be honest, if we’re talking a direct appeal for money, in a teen short term mission vs. bible translator match up, the teen is going to lose. But if the teen is offering me something I want or need to fund their trip, I’m probably going to go out of my way to buy from them.

I’ll give you an example.  A couple of years ago, a friends teenage daughter was raising funds for a short term mission trip. They did a variety of very creative fundraisers, but my favorite was the babysitting events where parents could drop off their kids and have a night out.  We went out of our way to patronize the event because we wanted to support their mission trip. Plus we got some alone time! I think we went to Home Depot.

There are a couple of benefits to this approach. First, you aren’t asking someone to spend extra money, you’re just asking them to direct money they would have spent toward you. Second, a kid working to earn their own way is really impressive. I’m 1,000 times more likely to tell friends and family to support that kid than to support the kid who sent me a letter or a link to a Go Fund Me site. Finally, we all value something more if we’ve earned it ourselves.

We think this will be our criteria for future donations for funding young people’s (very worthy and admirable!) experiences: we are happy to buy goods from you or pay you for services (if it’s in the budget!) in order to fund your mission trip, camp experience, etc. However, our direct donations are going to go to other places. And we’ve informed our kids that if they want to go on mission trips, they’ll be getting there from the fruit of their labor.

What do you think? How many appeals have you gotten this year and what is your criteria for donating? Would you be more willing to spend money for a worthy cause or just donate out right?

Summer fun

Maybe it’s the heat, but I believe in moving as little as possible in the summer. In fact, if I had my druthers, we’d lay around all day on or near water reading books and sipping icy drinks. Or better yet, eating snowcones or Blue Bell ice cream. But, alas, sometimes summer storms will thwart our pool going plans, and sometimes we want a little variety. So here are some of my favorite ideas for a lazy summer that won’t break the bank.

summer

Free summer movies and cheap summer movies. Of course, you’ll still have to take out a loan for snacks.

For local people, DFW on a budget.

Personally, I think a huge chunk of your summer should be devoted to lazing about reading. Here are a few summer reading programs:

Lots of communities have movies on the lawn. Of course, when the sun doesn’t set til past nine, that makes it hard if you have little guys.

Buzzfeed has collected the quintessential list of summer activities for Texans. Wisely, most of these involve water or ice.

What’s your favorite summer activity? Are you a lazy days of summer person or more energetic in your activities?

Fine Arts Friday: Poetry

Our culture has a tendency to shy away from poetry. We think it’s either too hard to understand or disdain it as something for intellectuals and angsty teen girls.  We no longer even use the word “poetry.” Now it’s “spoken word.” Pshaw. You’re a poet, and you know it. Poetry is really just storytelling. In fact, the oldest stories were told in poem form, because it’s much easier to memorize the long tale of Odysseus if it has rhythm and rhyme. When I think of poetry, I think of bards at great feasting halls, telling great hero stories.

One of the things that appeals to me about Charlotte Mason and her educational philosophy is that books, art, nature, and poetry aren’t presented to children as some means to an end. Children don’t read or memorize poetry because it helps develop their mental facilities. They study poetry so that they have a storehouse of beautiful thoughts and images on which to meditate. “Children are born persons” and persons need ideas that are good, beautiful, and true to feast upon.

However, since we tend to want our education to be “useful” (whatever that means), this is what Miss Mason wrote on the benefits and uses of poetry:

“Poetry is, perhaps, the most searching and intimate of our teachers. To know about such a poet and his works may be interesting, as it is to know about repousse work; but in the latter case we must know how to use the tools before we get joy and service out of the art. Poetry, too, supplies us with tools for the modelling of our lives, and the use of these we must get at for ourselves. The line that strikes us as we read, that recurs, that we murmur over at odd moments–this is the line that influences our living, if it speak only–

“Of old, unhappy, far-off things,
And battles long ago.”

“A couplet such as this, though it appear to carry no moral weight, instructs our conscience more effectually than many wise saws. As we ‘inwardly digest,’ reverence comes to us unawares, gentleness, a wistful tenderness towards the past, a sense of continuance, and of a part to play that shall not be loud and discordant, but of a piece with the whole. This is one of the ‘lessons never learned in schools’ which comes to each of us only as we discover it for ourselves.

“Many have a favourite poet for a year or two, to be discarded for another and another. Some are happy enough to find the poet of their lifetime in Spenser, Wordsworth, Browning, for example; but, whether it be for a year or a life, let us mark as we read, let us learn and inwardly digest. Note how good this last word is. What we digest we assimilate, take into ourselves, so that it is part and parcel of us, and no longer separable.

“We probably read Shakespeare in the first place for his stories, afterwards for his characters, the multitude of delightful persons with whom he makes us so intimate that afterwards, in fiction or in fact, we say, ‘She is another Jessica,’ and ‘That dear girl is a Miranda’; ‘She is a Cordelia to her father,’ and, such a figure in history, ‘a base lago.’ To become intimate with Shakespeare in this way is a great enrichment of mind and instruction of conscience. Then, by degrees, as we go on reading this world-teacher, lines of insight and beauty take possession of us, and unconsciously mould our judgments of men and things and of the great issues of life.”

I’ll admit, poetry is one of those things that gets shunted to the side.  I’m  not as deliberate at making time for it as I am other subjects and pursuits. But it is a necessary and much neglected aspect of literary language and story that deserves more care and attention. I’ve found when I do make room for poetry, we all enjoy it.

What poetry study is not: tearing apart every poem for rhyme scheme and meter. It isn’t writing essays on the meaning of the poem, which, in my opinion is seriously silly. Poetry study isn’t primarily analysing or critiquing.

What is poetry study then? Brace yourself: it’s reading and enjoying poetry. Furthermore, poetry is aural–it must be heard to truly be appreciated.  If you or your child is just reading poetry silently, you’re missing much (most) of the meaning and emotion. So poetry study is reading poetry. That’s not hard.

It’s also completely acceptable to decide that a certain poet is just not your style and toss him to the side. In our family, however, much like tasting all our vegetables, we have to try a couple of bites from a poet before deciding it’s yucky. You may also find that your children have different opinions on a poet than you and love a guy you can’t stand, or vice-versa.

I think my early attempts at poetry study were off the mark because I associated that primarily with having my children memorize poetry. Of course, poetry memorization is a good thing, but it’s not the only thing–or even the primary thing. Primarily, you should be reading good poetry (not what Miss Mason called “twaddle.) And your child should memorize a few poems a year.

For my younger children, poetry memorization is part of First Language Lessons, the grammar program we use. Now that the girls are older, they choose their own poems to memorize.  I tend to be a little more lax in our choosing our poets than is suggested by some Charlotte Mason advocates, and I should probably change that. We do like to pick poets that coincide with our history studies, so right now we’re looking at American poets. For example, my oldest chose to memorize “Paul Revere’s Ride” and my younger daughter then memorized “The Midnight Ride of William Dawes.”

Grant Wood’s “Midnight Ride of Paul Revere.” Poor, neglected William Dawes.

Remember, we study poetry because it is good and beautiful and delightful. It may be difficult to get into because it’s unfamiliar to us, but once we do, we ought to be enjoying ourselves.

Poetry study resources  and ideas.

I recommend having anthologies of poetry available for children to flip through and for you to access for you children. You can often pick these up at library sales, used book sales, and the discount sections of book stores for very reasonable prices.

Enjoy!

Unequal protection

Just when you thought it was safe to ignore Washington for the summer, more scandals and reports of government misconduct are circling. This time, the Justice Department has been caught having secretly subpoenaed the phone records of Associated Press reporters. In investigating a leak over a story on North Korea’s nuclear program, the department searched the emails of Fox News reporter James Rosen and subpoenaed phone records of his cell phone, his work, and even his parents home.

As a result, lawmakers have begun to discuss a federal media shield law. Of course, any media shield act adopted would have a national security exception, and thus would not have been applicable in these particular situations. But, assuming we are not discussing national security issues (like global warming?), then who gets special protection under a media shield law?

Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) asked some rather impertinent questions, “What is a journalist today in 2013? We know it’s someone that works for Fox or AP, but does it include a blogger? Does it include someone who is tweeting? Are these people journalists and entitled to constitutional protection?”

Bloggers, tweeters, columnists and average citizens are not entitled to constitutional protections for journalists.